Contra Costa County, CA | November 7, 2000 Election |
Offering Quality Learning Opportunities to StudentsBy L. L. "Vern" WeberCandidate for Governing Board Member; Acalanes Union High School District | |
This information is provided by the candidate |
The primary focus must be on maintaining and improving the ongoing, core educational programs, which are funded primarily by revenue limit and categorical funds, providing qualified faculty and support staff, and maximizing positive student/teacher interaction. Enhancing educational opportunities to students through a community-supported parcel tax would be beneficial, provided that the programs funded are sound and cost effective.Quality education is the result of positive interaction between teachers and students, both in and out of the classroom. The emphasis must therefore be on creating a positive work environment, providing quality faculty and support staff, and giving the teachers the support they need to do their jobs without disruption. The board and administration exist to comply with legal requirements and to ensure that few disruptions occur. Anything that negatively impacts the learning environment affects attitude which, in turn, affects behavior. Anything that takes a teacher away from his or her direct interaction with students negatively impacts educational outcomes. The recent events involving the parcel tax and the transfer of Acalanes Principal Keith Schmidt were major disruptions to the schools and communities. And the frustration of the teachers with the district board and administration, which escalated to the point of the Acalanes Education Association taking a "no confidence" position, makes it clear that much must be done to restore trust and again create a positive learning environment. While the previous parcel tax was badly handled, coming closely on the heels of the March primary and without adequate explanation of why a 79% increase in funding, there is still time to take it to the voters for renewal. To build community support for passage of a parcel tax, it is imperative that information be presented specifying the amount of money to be raised, the duration of the tax, the specific educational uses, and what the benefits would be to the students. There should also be a commitment to make annual evaluations of the programs funded. In other words, full disclosure and follow-up. If the parcel tax is again taken to the voters, and it were to lose, the district would have no alternative but to phase out most of the programs it funded. If the parcel tax failed, it would be desirable if there could be an orderly phase-out of the programs rather than immediately dropping them. To do so, however, there would have to be a re-direction of reserves and/or other district resources, which would impact negotiations. A phase-out program would therefore require a buy-in by employee groups. |
Next Page:
Position Paper 3
Candidate Page
|| Feedback to Candidate
|| This Contest
November 2000 Home (Ballot Lookup)
|| About Smart Voter
ca/cc
Created from information supplied by the candidate: October 16, 2000 14:23
Smart Voter 2000 <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © 2000
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor
opposes candidates for public office or political parties.