Butler, Preble, Darke, Miami, Shelby, Mercer Counties, OH | November 7, 2000 Election |
Taxation, the National Debt, and the Projected Federal Budget SurplusBy David R. ShockCandidate for United States Representative; District 8 | |
This information is provided by the candidate |
All of the anticipated proceeds from the federal budget surplus should be applied towards eliminating the national debt. I oppose efforts by Republicans and Democrats to use the money to increase the size of government.During the early 1980s, President Reagan and the Republicans made huge tax cuts based on the theory of supply-side economics. The theory of supply-side economics held that if huge tax and spending cuts were made, the benefits accruing from these actions would "trickle down" to those in need. While Reagan and the Republicans cut taxes, they never followed through on spending cuts. Government kept growing at a disturbing rate and the national debt ballooned to levels never before witnessed. The $1 trillion dollar national debt in 1980 was more than $3 trillion by the time Reagan left office in January 1989. Today, the national debt is quickly approaching $6 trillion, even when we are supposed to have surpluses. In the current era of low unemployment and overall prosperity, we lose sight of the national debt. The national debt is a monster that will stalk future generations, especially members of so-called "Generation X." The economy moves in cycles and the current prosperity today could easily give way to recession in several years. It is therefore imperative that the federal budget surplus be used in fiscally responsible ways to reduce future taxes and to reduce the future debt load on upcoming generations of young Americans. Current proposals by presidential candidates of the Democratic and Republican parties include such things "saving Social Security," "cutting taxes," and "reducing the national debt." I believe that we need to spend all of the projected budget surplus on reducing the national debt. The surplus may be a temporary phenomenon. It is difficult to project into the future with any certainty. Now is the time to use the surplus to free future generations from trillions of dollars of debt accumulated during the 1980s and 1990s. Cutting Taxes As a Libertarian, I believe in low taxes. I support ending the federal income tax as soon as it is feasibly possible. However, I strongly believe that before any significant tax cuts are made, the national debt must be eliminated for the sake of future generations of Americans. Eliminately the national debt is the moral and fiscally-responsibility way to use the current federal budget surpluses. The national debt and the costs associated with debt maintenance will be paid by a generation in the future that enjoyed none of the tax cuts of the 1980s. Taxes can and must be cut once the national debt is brought under control. We must not pass up the opportunity that we currently have to significantly reduce the national debt. Roughly 15 percent of the federal budget goes to debt service. If the debt were to be eliminated, this 15 percent could immediately be used for tax relief without cutting any spending. If elected, I would fight hard to ensure that the federal budget surpluses are used to eliminate the national debt. |
Next Page:
Position Paper 2
Candidate Page
|| Feedback to Candidate
|| This Contest
November 2000 Home (Ballot Lookup)
|| About Smart Voter
oh/state
Created from information supplied by the candidate: September 19, 2000 13:04
Smart Voter 2000 <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © 2000
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor
opposes candidates for public office or political parties.