LWV League of Women Voters of California
Smart Voter
State of California November 5, 2002 Election
Proposition 48
Court Consolidation
State of California

Legislative Constitutional Amendment

4,642,292 / 72.8% Yes votes ...... 1,735,074 / 27.2% No votes

See Also: Index of all Propositions

Results as of Nov 14 11:14am, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (24726/24726)
Information shown below: Summary | Fiscal Impact | Yes/No Meaning | Official Information | Arguments |

Should the California Constitution be amended to delete references to the municipal courts?

Summary:
Amends Constitution to delete references to the municipal courts, which references are now obsolete due to the consolidation of superior and municipal trial courts into unified superior courts.

Fiscal Impact:
No additional cost to state or local government.

Meaning of Voting Yes/No
A YES vote of this measure means:
The California Constitution would be amended to remove obsolete references to the municipal courts, and to make conforming changes relating to the membership of the California Judicial Council and the membership of the Commission on Judicial Performance.

A NO vote of this measure means:
The California Constitution would not be amended to remove obsolete references to the municipal courts, and would not be amended to make conforming changes to the membership of the California Judicial Council and the membership of the Commission on Judicial Performance.

Official Sources of Information
Arguments Submitted to

Summary of Arguments FOR Proposition 48:
Four years ago the voters authorized the elimination of municipal courts. Municipal courts no longer exist. Their function has been merged into the superior court, for an estimated annual savings of $23,000,000. Proposition 48 cleans up the California Constitution by eliminating obsolete references to the former municipal courts.

Full Text of Argument In Favor, Rebuttal

Summary of Arguments AGAINST Proposition 48:
Proposition 48 would unwisely prohibit the re-establishment of "municipal courts" in any of California's 58 counties. The elimination of municipal courts in favor of a single "superior court" in each county has created at least the appearance of unfairness and has made local courts more insular and less accountable.

Full Text of Argument Against, Rebuttal

Contact FOR Proposition 48:
Nathaniel Sterling
California Law Revision Commission
4000 Middlefield Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
650-494-1335
sterling@clrc.ca.gov
http://www.clrc.ca.gov

Contact AGAINST Proposition 48:
Gary B. Wesley
Voter Information Alliance (VIA)
P.O. Box 90151
San Jose, CA 95109
408-882-5070 http://www.VoterInformationAlliance.org

  Official Information

Secretary of State

Legislative Analysts's Office Nonpartisan Information

League of Women Voters - Analysis

League of Women Voters - Background California Voter Foundation Events

LWV Pros & Cons Public Meetings

  • Come to a meeting in your community where League experts discuss all state ballot propositions giving a nonpartisan analysis. Consult your Smart Voter county page for dates, times and locations.
Suggest a link related to Proposition 48
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.


California Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: December 6, 2002 03:15 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://ca.lwv.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.