Despite the economic changes of the past years, the need for more housing - particularly more affordable housing - is still great. The jobs/housing imbalance means that Mountain View workers must commute great distances, causing environmental damage and loss of quality of life. Lack of affordable housing is an issue for long time residents who want to remain in the city and for Mountain View businesses, whose workers need places to live.
 
Part of the problem is that localities are
disincentivized from building housing due to 
the fiscalization of land use problem: as 
localities get a greater and greater portion of 
their revenues from sales taxes, cities find 
themselves competing with one another to 
bring in revenue-producing retail chains such 
as CostCo, and are unlikely to invest in 
housing, which requires services but produces 
less revenue. Cities must play a greater role in 
lobbying for regional and statewide structural 
change to eliminate this fiscalization of land 
use. 
 
 
Mountain View has already made great 
strides in the area of housing, winning awards 
for its transit-oriented developments and 
making affordable housing a priority, but 
much more work is needed. The city's housing 
element is extremely well formulated; what is 
needed now is the political will to make sure 
that we follow through on the housing 
element action items. Mobile home parks are 
an important part of the overall affordable 
housing picture and the city must stay 
engaged to ensure that they remain so. 
Options also exist in the downtown area, with 
two city-owned plots in residentially-zoned 
areas ideal for housing development. An 
affordable housing group has expressed 
interest in one of these parcels. 
 
 
With the current high vacancy rate for 
commercial space, this is an ideal time to look 
for opportunities to re-zone commercial space 
for housing, where appropriate. The Mayfield Mall 
site is one example of an opportunity for a 
variety of housing types, including both 
single- and multi-family housing, as well as a 
significant addition of park land.  This site 
is adjacent to existing residential, so it makes 
sense to re-zone it for housing. The site is also 
along the CalTrain corridor, making it a perfect 
location for transit-oriented development. 
 
 
I support the development strategies of smart 
growth and transit-oriented development. We 
should be looking to put housing near transit 
wherever possible. There are opportunities for 
smart development in and near the downtown 
and our multi-modal transit hub. (For 
example, the blocks of Moffett Blvd near the 
train station are ripe for development and 
right across from downtown.) It also makes 
sense to encourage new housing and new 
park land on larger developments such as 
Whisman Station. 
 
 
Increased numbers of housing units 
downtown will benefit our economy, bringing 
more customers to downtown businesses. 
Additionally, the more people we have living 
in downtown, the more feasible it becomes to 
attract residential-serving retail such as a 
drugstores or grocery stores, which would 
make the downtown that much more robust. 
 
 |