- Establishes in state constitution a system of independent public community college districts and
Board of Governors.
- Generally, requires minimum levels of state funding for school districts and community college
districts to be calculated separately, using different criteria and separately appropriated.
- Allocates 10.46 percent of current Proposition 98 school funding maintenance factor to community
colleges.
- Sets community college fees at $15/unit per semester; limits future fee increases.
- Provides formula for allocation by Legislature to community college districts that would not
otherwise receive general fund revenues through community college apportionment.
Increased state spending on K-14 education from 2007-08
through 2009-10 averaging about $300 million annually,
with unknown impacts annually thereafter. Potential loss in
community college student fee revenues of about $70 million
annually.
- A YES vote on this measure means:
- The existing formula that
establishes a minimum
funding level for K-12
schools and community
colleges would be replaced
with separate formulas for
each system. Community
college fees would be reduced
from $20 per unit to $15 per
unit, and various changes
would be made to the state level
community college
governing board.
- A NO vote on this measure means:
- Existing
laws regarding community
college funding, fees, and
governance would be
unchanged.
- Summary of Arguments FOR Proposition 92:
- Proposition 92
doesn't raise taxes. It
lowers community college
fees to $15 per unit, limits
future fee increases, and
stabilizes funding. When
the Legislature doubled
community college fees,
305,000 fewer Californians
enrolled. Wages for students
who earn a community
college vocational degree
jump from $25,600 to
$47,571 in three years.
See also full Arguments and Rebuttals
- Summary of Arguments AGAINST Proposition 92:
- 92 isn't what it seems.
It locks huge new
spending into California's
Constitution with no way to
pay for it, which could result
in new taxes or cuts to critical
programs, including K-12
schools. It contains no
accountability and no
guarantee funds will reach
college classrooms. No on 92.
See also full Arguments and Rebuttals
- Contact FOR Proposition 92:
- Scott Lay
Yes on Proposition 92
2017 O Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
(916) 444-8641
admin@prop92yes.com
http://www.prop92yes.com
- Contact AGAINST Proposition 92:
- Californians for Fair
Education Funding,
No on Proposition 92
3001 Douglas Blvd. #225
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 218-6640
info@noprop92.org
http://www.noprop92.org
|
|
No Spin Information
League of Women Voters
Other Nonpartisan Sources
Events
KQED/FM (SF Public Radio)
KPCC 89.3 (Southern CA Public Radio)
Video Voter Minutes
League of Women Voters Video of Pros & Cons
Official Information
Secretary of State
Campaign Finance Data
California Voter Foundation
Secretary of State
- Cal-Access
- how much money is being raised and spent on Prop 92
News and Analysis
Google News Search
Message to News Reporters
- If you use our website for your research, please encourage your readers to go to smartvoter.org!
|
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
|
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|