|
Click on ballot measure for more detail.
- Measure B.
Irrigation District Change In Number Of Divisions
-- Byron-Bethany Irrigation District
(Majority Approval Required)
 Pass:
1,568 /
85.7% Yes votes ......
261 /
14.3% No votes
548
(85.23%) Yes / 95 (14.77%) No in Contra Costa County
16
(94.12%) Yes / 1 (5.88%) No in Alameda County
1004
(85.89%) Yes / 165 (14.11%) No in San Joaquin County
- Shall the number of divisions within the Byron Bethany Irrigation District be changed from nine divisions to seven divisions and thereby also reducing the members of the board of directors? Fiscal Impact: Potential annual savings to Byron Bethany Irrigation District of $48,000.
- Measure C.
Repairs and Improvement of Facilities and Technology
-- Mount Diablo Unified School District
(Bond Measure - 55% Approval Required)
Pass:
32152 /
60.88% Yes votes ......
20662 /
39.12% No votes
- To support quality education and safety for local students, and reduce impacts of State budget cuts by improving science, career and technical education facilities; upgrading classroom instructional technology; repairing leaky roofs; improving safety; maximizing energy efficiency including adding solar panels and modern air conditioning; and repairing, replacing, equipping or modernizing other school facilities; shall Mt. Diablo Unified School District issue $348,000,000 of bonds at legal interest rates, with independent citizen oversight, audits, and no money for administrator salaries?
- Measure D.
Student Safety / Classroom Repair Bond Measure
-- West Contra Costa Unified School District
(Bond Measure - 55% Approval Required)
Pass:
23014 /
62.62% Yes votes ......
13740 /
37.38% No votes
- To make schools safe, complete essential health/safety repairs, qualify for State matching grants, shall West Contra Costa Unified School District upgrade schools for earthquake safety/handicap accessibility, remove asbestos, upgrade restrooms, vocational classrooms/technology/energy systems to reduce costs, install lighting and security systems, acquire, repair, construct, equipment/sites/facilities, by issuing $380,000,000 in bonds within legal rates and bonding capacity limits with independent audits, citizen oversight, and no money for administrators' salaries?
- Measure E.
Special Parcel Tax for Police Protection Services
-- County Service Area P-6, Zone 3111
(Special Tax - 2/3 Approval Required)
 Fail:
1272 /
47.44% Yes votes ......
1409 /
52.56% No votes
- Shall Ordinance No. 2010-03, to provide additional funding for police protection services, be approved to authorize a special tax on property located in Zone 3111 of County Service Area P-6 in the unincorporated area of El Sobrante, at an initial annual amount of $38 per parcel for single-family, residential parcels, with higher and lower amounts for properties in other use categories identified in the ordinance, commencing with the tax year beginning July 1, 2010, and ending on June 30, 2015?
- Measure F.
Expand Urban Limit Line; Permit Mixed-Use Development
-- City of Brentwood
(Initiative Measure - Majority Approval Required)
Fail:
4251 /
42.71% Yes votes ......
5702 /
57.29% No votes
- Shall the Initiative Adopting a City of Brentwood Voter Approved Urban Limit Line; Permitting Mixed Use Development; and Providing Funds for Jobs, Sports and Recreational Fields and Public Safety be adopted?
- Measure G.
Special Tax for Police Protection Services
-- Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District
(Special Tax - 2/3 Approval Required)
Pass:
1478 /
68.58% Yes votes ......
677 /
31.42% No votes
- Shall Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District Ordinance No. 2010-01, which imposes a Supplemental Special Tax for Kensington Police Department services in an initial annual amount of not to exceed $200.00 for single family residential parcels, subject to CPI, with amounts for properties in other use categories identified in the ordinance, commencing FY 2010/11, be approved and shall the District appropriations limit be increased by the amount of this voter-approved tax?
|
|
|
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
|
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
