|
Click on ballot measure for more detail.
- Proposition 3.
Bay Area Traffic Relief Plan
-- City and County of San Francisco
County of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Sonoma and Solano
(Majority Approval Required)
 Pass:
883,703 /
55.0% Yes votes ......
722,971 /
45.0% No votes
173,275
(53.89%) Yes / 148,245 (46.11%) No in Alameda County
101070
(44.54%) Yes / 125851 (55.46%) No in Contra Costa County
48090
(60.52%) Yes / 31366 (39.48%) No in Marin County
17,350
(50.76%) Yes / 16,828 (49.24%) No in Napa County
212661
(61.44%) Yes / 133488 (38.56%) No in Santa Clara County
153,812
(65.4%) Yes / 81,383 (34.6%) No in San Francisco County
24182
(30.0%) Yes / 56334 (70.0%) No in Solano County
86,257
(54.88%) Yes / 70,920 (45.12%) No in San Mateo County
67,006
(53.4%) Yes / 58,556 (46.6%) No in Sonoma County
- Shall voters authorize a plan to reduce auto and truck traffic, relieve crowding on BART, unclog freeway bottlenecks, and improve bus, ferry, BART and commuter rail service as specified in the plan in this voter pamphlet, with a $1 toll increase effective in 2019, a $1 increase in 2022, and a $1 increase in 2025, on all Bay Area toll bridges except the Golden Gate Bridge, with independent oversight of all funds?
- Proposition A.
Public Utilities Revenue Bonds
-- City and County of San Francisco
(Majority Approval Required)
Pass:
181,638 /
77.22% Yes votes ......
53,572 /
22.78% No votes
- Shall the City authorize the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to issue revenue bonds to build or improve the City's clean power facilities, with approval by two-thirds of the Board of Supervisors, and prohibit the PUC from financing construction of power plants that generate electricity from fossil fuels or nuclear power?
- Proposition B.
Prohibiting Appointed Commissioners from Running for Office
-- City and County of San Francisco
(Majority Approval Required)
Pass:
160,214 /
69.72% Yes votes ......
69,570 /
30.28% No votes
- Shall the City require appointed members of boards and commissions established by the Charter to forfeit their appointed seat when they file to run for state or local elective office?
- Proposition C.
Additional Tax on Commercial Rents Mostly to Fund Child Care and Education
-- City and County of San Francisco
(Majority Approval Required)
Pass:
120,199 /
50.87% Yes votes ......
116,085 /
49.13% No votes
- Shall the City impose a new gross receipts tax of 1% on revenues a business receives from leasing warehouse space in San Francisco, and 3.5% on revenues a business receives from leasing some commercial spaces in San Francisco, to fund quality early care and education for young children and for other public purposes?
- Proposition D.
Additional Tax on Commercial Rents Mostly to Fund Housing and Homelessness Services
-- City and County of San Francisco
(Majority Approval Required)
 Fail:
105,746 /
44.93% Yes votes ......
129,611 /
55.07% No votes
- Shall the City impose a new gross receipts tax of 1.7% on revenues a business receives from leasing some commercial spaces in San Francisco, to fund homeless services, housing for extremely low-to middle-income households and for other public purposes?
- Proposition E.
Prohibiting Tobacco Retailers from Selling Flavored Tobacco Products
-- City and County of San Francisco
(Majority Approval Required)
Pass:
164,844 /
68.39% Yes votes ......
76,193 /
31.61% No votes
- Shall the City ordinance prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products in San Francisco take effect?
- Proposition F.
City-Funded Legal Representation for Residential Tenants in Eviction Lawsuits
-- City and County of San Francisco
(Majority Approval Required)
Pass:
133,190 /
55.74% Yes votes ......
105,774 /
44.26% No votes
- Shall the City establish, fund and run a program to provide legal representation for all residential tenants in San Francisco facing eviction?
- Proposition G.
Parcel Tax for San Francisco Unified School District
-- City and County of San Francisco
(Majority Approval Required)
Pass:
144,686 /
60.76% Yes votes ......
93,447 /
39.24% No votes
- Shall the City collect an annual tax of $298 per parcel for investment in education, subject to certain exemptions including those for senior citizens?
- Proposition H.
Policy for the Use of Tasers by San Francisco Police Officers
-- City and County of San Francisco
(Majority Approval Required)
Fail:
90,334 /
38.06% Yes votes ......
146,997 /
61.94% No votes
- Shall the City set a policy for when police officers can use tasers and authorize the Police Department to purchase
tasers for all officers, subject to specific conditions?
- Proposition I.
Relocation of Professional Sports Teams
-- City and County of San Francisco
(Majority Approval Required)
Fail:
97,863 /
42.78% Yes votes ......
130,916 /
57.22% No votes
- Shall the City adopt a policy not to encourage professional sports teams from other cities to move to San Francisco and
to oppose any sports team ownership group attempting to avoid payment of an outstanding public debt?
|
|
|
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
|
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
